Here is the HTML as shown by IE:

<table id="j_id_jsp_1221544356_5:graphDataProperty" class="mgmtTable">
    <caption class="mgmtCaption">Graph Data Set</caption>
    <thead>
        <tr>
            <th class="mgmtTableHeader" scope="col">Module</th>
            <th class="mgmtTableHeader" scope="col">Module Instance</th>
            <th class="mgmtTableHeader" scope="col">Property</th>
            <th class="mgmtTableHeader" scope="col">Property Instance</th>
            <th class="mgmtTableHeader" scope="col">Actions</th>
        </tr>
    </thead>

    <caption>Graph Data Set</caption>

    <tbody id="j_id_jsp_1221544356_5:graphDataProperty:tbody_element">
        <tr class="mgmtTableRow">
            <td class="mgmtTableColumn">kernel-reader-simple</td>
            <td class="mgmtTableColumn"></td>
            <td class="mgmtTableColumn">% Memory Used</td>
            <td class="mgmtTableColumn">0</td>
            <td class="mgmtTableColumn"></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>


----- Original Message ----
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MyFaces Discussion <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 11:00:53 AM
Subject: Re: Duplicate caption for dataTable

Roland Hammerle schrieb:
> The following code renders the table caption twice in IE. It works fine in 
> Firefox.
>
> <h:dataTable>
>
>     <f:facet name="caption">
>         <h:outputText value="#{msgs.table_graphDataSet}"/>
>     </f:facet>
>
>     <h:column>
>         <f:facet name="header">
>             <h:outputText value="#{msgs.column_module}"/>
>         </f:facet>
>         <h:outputText value="#{graphDataProperty.dataProperty.module}"/>
>     </h:column>
>
> </h:dataTable>
>
> I am using MyFaces 1.2.2.
>
> I found a bug report for this 
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1126). However, it was closed 
> as invalid without a comment. (Maybe because it was for the Tomahawk data 
> table?)
>
> I haven't much on this issue. I'd appreciate your help.
>   
Can you please show the revant html that gets rendered?




Reply via email to