I think just in the table, but I haven't had a chance to work on it yet
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:48 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > Thanks! That's a very useful comment. One more question about that bug you > mention. Does it break command links on the whole page, or just the ones > that are inside the treeTable? > > Best regards, > Bart Kummel > > "Andrew Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18-06-2008 > 17:15:12: > >> I tried to look into adding multiple roots, but the refactoring was >> way too much work. I ended up adding the hide root node functionality >> instead. With that said, there is an open bug on the treeTable with >> the root node hidden that breaks command link events that I have yet >> to look into. Just wanted to make sure you consider that. >> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Michael Meierhoff >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Hi Bart, >> > >> > no it is not possible to have more than one root element in a a >> > treeTable. >> > What you can do is, add one root element and hide this. This is what >> > have >> > done. >> > >> > Best regards Michael >> > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > We're using a tr:treeTable in our project and it is required that more >> > than >> > one item of the topmost level is shown. In other words, we have to get >> > rid >> > of the "show 1-1 from 23" pull down box; we don't want pagination fot >> > this >> > application. We tried the rowsByDepth parameter of the treeTable, but it >> > seems to have influence on all levels except the top level. Is there a >> > way >> > to display more than one item of the top level? Or is it simply >> > impossible? >> > (We're thinking of adding a single top element to our model, but that's >> > not >> > a really elegant solution in my opinion.) >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Bart Kummel >
