> 1. Andrew: Back in 2007 there was a posting between you and mraible about > getting the OnLoad components built with maven so they would be available > on the maven repo. Did this occur? I looked in the repo but only found > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/net/sourceforge/jsf-comp/acegi-jsf/.
I never maven'd the project. I have no idea if anyone ever uploaded the jars to central. I may look into it, but it could be a while > 1a. If it was built, are the components stored in another repo? Not by me. I hadn't learned maven yet when I made this project, so it is ANT based > 2. I ran a test where I extended the beforeHandleNavigation function and > returned false; however, the navigation continued to the index.jspx page. > What is the purpose of the boolean returned from beforeHandleNavigation? I > expected it to stay on the same page with false. That is odd. Looking at line 204, I don't see how that could happen. Did you debug into it to see it being called? http://jsf-comp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jsf-comp/trunk/extensions/jsfExt/src/net/sf/jsfcomp/ext/onload/OnLoadPhaseListener.java?view=markup > 3. Is there an advantage of setting the "success-result" setting in > onload-config.xml? Better performance as the result doesn't have to be passed through the navigation handler > 3a. Does it bypass the face-config.xml navigation rule on the view-id check > when success-result matches the outcome of action? Yes, the navigation handler is never invoked (see line 201 of the PhaseListener) > 4. Is the "action" variable in onload-config.xml EL? The action to execute (EL that points to an action method) > 4a. If I set the action to the following: #{scoreController.score1} I get a > javax.faces.el.MethodNotFoundException because it is trying to access: > [EMAIL PROTECTED](). If I use the full function name > getScore1(), this it works correctly. Do I have something setup > incorrectly? It is an action method, not a property. So use the same syntax as you would with <h:commandButton action="#{ some action method here }" /> > Thank you again for helping me get this going. You're welcome, hope it works out for you. > > -Nate >
