Till Tomahawk 1.1.7 release, we still did not apply the fileupload portlet support.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would be very suprised if this is the case. The ActionRequest has a > getFileInputStream which is what most renderkit implemementations use to > handle file-uploads. My guess is that they are basically saying that if you > have binary data in your request, you are on your own as far as processing > it (ie. submitted parameters and whatnot won't show up). Still, I don't > know why fileuploads in trinidad (for instance) wouldn't work. I also think > Tomahawk has added portlet support to their fileupload component but > Leonardo might be able to clairfy that. > > Scott > > > Nutulapati, Krishna wrote: > >> If Binary transfer is not supported, try using java script to implement >> this functionality. >> Here is the good link, that might help you. >> http://4umi.com/web/javascript/filewrite.php >> Krishna >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* Ayub Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> *Sent:* Friday, September 19, 2008 3:35 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* FileUpload component in portal >> >> Hi, >> >> I read online article and also in ibm red book that FileUpload component >> and any binary data transfer is not supported in the Portal environment. >> Could any suggest an alternate approach for achieving the fileUpload in >> websphere portal ? >> >> Thanks and Regards >> Ayub >> -- >> -- "Two roads diverged in a wood >> And I took the one less traveled by >> And that has made all the difference. >> >> Robert Frost....." >> > > -- Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed Web blog: http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog [Web 2.0] GMaps Integration with JSF + Apache Tomahawk + JBoss a4j: http://code.google.com/p/gmaps4jsf/
