I was a little fast, when I was sending you my response. After I had sent it I've noticed that you are using 1.1 version of JSF RI and that due to java 1.4 you cannot switch to newer implementation, which in fact we are using. Currently we use JSF RI 1.2_09 and Tomahawk 1.1.7 - 1.1.8.
Greetings Pawel Madhav Bhargava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2008-11-24 11:41:45: > Hi Pawel, > > What was the version of tomahawk and Sun RI libraries that you used? > > Thanks, > M > > >Hi, > >Although I'm not able to help you with websphere deployment, I can > assure you that generally speaking, YES, it is >possible to run > Tomahawk without Myfaces implementation of JSF. In our projects we > were forced to switch to RI >implementation due to buggy myfaces > libraries, but we didn't want to drop Tomahawk extensions and we went > > successful. The difference is, that we use Tomcat 6.x instead of websphere. > > >Greetings > >Pawel > > > Madhav Bhargava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2008-11-24 11:19:27: > > > Hi Anton, > > Unfortunately we are using Sun RI 1.1 implementation (as we are > > still stuck with JDK 1.4.2). The matrix does not have any entry for > > the same which will reveal its compatibility with tomahawk. > > > > Thanks, > > M > > > > > Look on this page > > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CompatibilityMatrix > > > > > Hope it will help > > > > 2008/11/24 Madhav Bhargava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am using the following JSF jars provided as part of websphere 6.0 server > > > lib: > > > > > > > > > > > > Jsf-api.jar - present in AppServer/lib > > > > > > Ws-jsf.jar - present in AppServer/lib > > > > > > jsf-ibm.jar - present in WEB-INF/lib > > > > > > > > > > > > Since the JSF RI provided by Sun and IBM do not have inherent support for > > > Tiles I thought of using Tomahawk JspTilesViewHandlerImpl. So I included > > > tomahawk 1.1.5 binary in the WEB-INF/lib > > > > > > > > > > > > I changed the faces-config.xml to have <view-handler> point to > > > org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk.application.jsp.JspTilesViewHandlerImpl > > > > > > > > > > > > Since I was still not using any of the tomahawk components I did > not include > > > the extensionFilter (org.apache.myfaces.webapp.filter.ExtensionsFilter) in > > > web.xml. > > > > > > > > > > > > When I tried deploying my application it gave an exception whose > stack trace > > > is attached with this mail. The same exception was thrown even after I had > > > configured extensionFilter in web.xml > > > > > > > > > > > > Can tomahawk (1.1.5 or 1.1.6) be used with the JSF RI provided as part of > > > Sun and IBM? In other words can tomahawk be used without using myfaces as > > > the RI? Ideally it should but I have noticed that in the JSF > world of today > > > things are far from ideal. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any help would really be appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Madhav > > > > > > > > > > > > **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** > > > This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION > intended solely > > > for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, > > > please > > > notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you > > > are not > > > to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other > > > person and > > > any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. > Infosys has > > > taken > > > every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not > liable for any > > > damage > > > you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry > > > out your > > > own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves > > > the > > > right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to > orfrom this > > > e-mail > > > address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the > > > Infosys e-mail system. > > > ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***
