On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Matthias Wessendorf<[email protected]> wrote:
> ok, I will handle it, maybe already for 1.0.11.

I marked this for 1.0.12.

-Matthias

>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> I am keeping this "testing mode" open for the rest of the week,
> so that we can hit the VOTE next week. Which means by
> end-of-next-week there should be a 1.0.11 out
>
> -Matthias
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Paul Mander<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> It appears that this class hasn't changed since the fix was provided. The
>> change is to introduce a new method:
>>
>>  private void _renderShowComboBoxScriptForIE6(FacesContext context,
>>          RenderingContext    arc,
>>          FacesBean           bean,
>>          String              baseId) throws IOException
>> {
>> if ("ie".equals(arc.getAgent().getAgentName()) &&
>> arc.getAgent().getAgentVersion().startsWith("6"))
>> {
>> // IE6 only
>> final ResponseWriter writer = context.getResponseWriter();
>> final String monthId = (baseId != null) ? baseId +
>> ChooseDateRenderer.MONTH_PARAM : ChooseDateRenderer.MONTH_PARAM;
>> final String yearId = (baseId != null) ? baseId +
>> ChooseDateRenderer.YEAR_PARAM : ChooseDateRenderer.YEAR_PARAM;
>>
>> writer.startElement("script", null);
>> writer.writeAttribute("type", "text/javascript", null);
>> writer.writeText("window.onload=showCombo; \n", null);
>> writer.writeText("function showCombo() { \n", null);
>> // Normal Trinidad onLoad;
>> writer.writeText("_checkLoad(); \n", null);
>> writer.writeText("document.getElementById('" + monthId + "').style.cssText =
>> 'display: inline !important; visibility: visible !important;'; \n", null);
>> writer.writeText("document.getElementById('" + yearId +  "').style.cssText =
>> 'display: inline !important; visibility: visible !important;'; \n", null);
>> // ToDo: Resize iframe to remove scrollbars:
>> writer.writeText("return true; \n", null);
>> writer.writeText("} \n", null);
>>
>> writer.endElement("script");
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>> and call it unconditionally at the very end of encodeAll.
>>
>> Sorry, but I'm not in a position to to a diff.
>>
>>
>> Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I see - maybe we should make this become part of 1.0.12 ?
>>> Question: Can you upload a DIFF ? That makes reviewing much easier,
>>> instead
>>> of replacing a .java file
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--1.0.11-release-candidate---please-test-tp25138955p25150152.html
>> Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Reply via email to