That's also an option!
2010/1/14 Mike Kienenberger <[email protected]>
> Wow. I just saw this, and it's really ugly. I wonder if some of my
> app's code is mysteriously breaking now.
>
> Why couldn't you do something like Michael's workaround instead of
> trying to replace "this" with "document.getElementById('...')". Ie,
> pass "this" as an argument to the intermediate function, and use the
> argument passed wherever "this" appears?
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Jakob Korherr <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Unfortunately I don't think it is possible to refer to the clicked link
> > inside the function definition. The only way I know is to use
> > document.getElementById('...').
> >
> > »How is the id of the commandLink placed into oamSubmitForm as
> parameter?«
> > The renderer of the command link generates this javascript and so it puts
> > the id there.
> >
> > From my point of view it would be great if myfaces would replace »this«
> with
> > »document.getElementById('clienId')« automatically. However, I don't know
> if
> > this violates the jsf 1.2 spec.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jakob
> >
> > 2010/1/4 Michael Heinen <[email protected]>
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have another problem after my update from myfaces 1.1.5 to 1.2.8.
> >> I cannot use "this" anymore in onclick attributes of commandLinks due to
> >> changed rendering of commandLinks. Instead of the link the outer form is
> >> accessed via "this".
> >>
> >> sample:
> >> <h:form id="tabform" ...>
> >> <t:commandLink id="tabTemplates" forceId="true"
> >> onclick="alert(this.id);"
> >> action="#{...}">
> >>
> >> output with 1.1.5: tabTemplates
> >> output with 1.2.8: tabform
> >>
> >> rendered html onclick attributes:
> >> myfaces 1.2.8: onclick=var cf = function(){alert(this.id);var oamSF =
> >> function(){return oamSubmitForm('tabform','tabTemplates');};return
> >> (cf()==false)? false : oamSF();
> >> myfaces 1.1.5: onclick=alert(this.id);
> >>
> >> One workaround is something like this:
> >> onclick="var me1=getObj('tabTemplates'); alert(m1);"
> >>
> >> This change is unfortunately really expensive and error-prone for me
> >> because I used this construct more than hundred times and often it is
> >> generated dynamically :-(
> >>
> >> Is there any other workaround or trick to access the clicked link in the
> >> onclick attribute via javascript inside a function definition?
> >> How is the id of the commandLink placed into oamSubmitForm as parameter?
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >
>