Hi Joachim, The pageFlowScope is *the* alternative for <t:savestate>. I don't see why pageFlowScope is less convenient. I admit you'll have to get used to it. But in the end, I think pageFlowScope is a more structural solution. And pageFlowScope is more versatile, as it can be used across pages too.
You should also be aware that JSF 2.0 uses a similar solution to this problem. So by getting used to pageFlowScope you are already preparing yourself for a switch to JSF 2.0... Best regards, Bart On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 15:38, Joachim Schrod <[email protected]> wrote: > Bart Kummel wrote: > > Hello, > > >> Why are you mixing Tomahawk and Trinidad components? Apart from some >> special >> cases (e.g. captcha and schedule) there are Trinidad alternatives to every >> Tomahawk component. >> > > What do you use as the Trinidad replacement for t:savestate, as a method to > cache request-scoped beans on the same page? E.g., to avoid the need for > another database roundtrip in postback or redirect requests. > > I know pageFlowScope, but it is more inconvenient to use and has also a > slightly different focus, AFAIU. > > Joachim > > -- > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Joachim Schrod Email: [email protected] > Roedermark, Germany > > -- ___________________________________________________________ Bart Kummel Author of the book "Apache MyFaces 1.2 Web Application Development" See http://tinyurl.com/am12wad
