Hi again, My bad, I had Junit tests deployed with my application and the annotation scanner picked up @RunWith and so forth without finding them (because I don´t deploy the JUnit jar). No it seems to be working ;-)
Thanks for all your help! Regards, Hampus -----Original Message----- From: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: den 18 augusti 2011 22:46 To: MyFaces Discussion Cc: Udo Schnurpfeil Subject: Re: Window ID prototype, MyFaces extension hi hampus, maybe udo had this (owb) exception as well and can help you with that. (otherwise we have to look at the details.) fyi: if there are further questions about owb itself, you are also very welcome to send them to the mailing list of owb [1]. e.g. mark and i and for sure the owb community in general will be happy to answer your questions about owb. the second exception is caused by the first one. however, if you solve the first one and you still get the second one, you need [2]. this add-on is required for some jee 5 servers to ensure the correct bootstrapping order. regards, gerhard [1] http://openwebbeans.apache.org/owb/mail-lists.html [2] http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/myfaces-codi-addons/source/brow se/#hg%2Fcontrolled_bootstrapping_owb http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2011/8/18 Hampus Wingren <[email protected]> > Ok, so I´ve tried with open webbeans and codi on websphere 6.1 but I > keep ending up with: > > Caused by: > org.apache.webbeans.corespi.scanner.AnnotationDB$CrossReferenceException > at > org.apache.webbeans.corespi.scanner.AnnotationDB.crossReferenceMetaAnnotatio ns(AnnotationDB.java:173) > at > org.apache.webbeans.corespi.scanner.AbstractMetaDataDiscovery.crossReference Beans(AbstractMetaDataDiscovery.java:229) > ... 91 more > > And later on during startup: (I guess this error could be caused by > the first one) > > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: no > org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.core.api.provider.BeanManagerProvide > r in place! Please ensure that you configured the CDI implementation > of your choice properly. If your setup is correct, please clear all > caches and compiled artifacts. If there is still a problem, try one of > the controlled bootstrapping add-ons for the CDI implementation you are using. > at > org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.core.api.provider.BeanManagerProvider.getI nstance(BeanManagerProvider.java:79) > at > org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.core.impl.util.CodiUtils.getContextualRefe renceByClass(CodiUtils.java:124) > at > org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.jsf.impl.listener.phase.PhaseListenerExten sion.consumePhaseListeners(PhaseListenerExtension.java:111) > at > org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.jsf2.impl.listener.phase.CodiLifecycleFact oryWrapper.getLifecycle(CodiLifecycleFactoryWrapper.java:67) > at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.init(FacesServlet.java:119) > > I can´t really figure out what I´m doing wrong, are there some > configuration options I must consider? > > Regards, > Hampus > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hampus Wingren [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: den 18 augusti 2011 13:52 > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: Re: Window ID prototype, MyFaces extension > > Ok, > > thanks a lot, I´ll give it a try! > > regards, > Hampus > > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:35:31 +0200, Gerhard Petracek < > [email protected]> wrote: > > hi hampus, > > > > we plan to release both codi v1.0.1 as well as owb v1.1.1 within the > > next days. > > udo (the reporter of the jira issues [1], [2]) already uses the > > latest snapshots in a java 1.5 environment. > > you can use those snapshots for the next days. you will see both > > releases earlier than a first window-id-prototype in myfaces-core > > (there is no fixed schedule for it - i'll continue with it after > > releasing codi v1.0.1). > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-198 > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-582 > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > Courses in English and German > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > 2011/8/18 Hampus Wingren <[email protected]> > > > >> hi gerhard, > >> > >> That seems like a small price to pay. Do you have a timeframe for > >> prototyping? > >> > >> I saw that´s it not a high prioritized item on the JSF 2.2 issue > >> list, do we know if it will be included? > >> I looked at apache owb but it seems to require java 6. Any other > >> good cdi implementation other than weld? Looking at the issue lists > >> for codi, it seems like weld is a major contributor to the issues. > >> > >> regards, > >> Hampus > >> > >> I looked at apache owb but it seems to be requiring java 6 > >> > >> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:07:41 +0200, Gerhard Petracek > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > hi hampus, > >> > > >> > it might be available as a part of the myfaces specific api until > >> > it gets accepted. however, it needs to be discussed on the dev > >> > list as soon as we have a first prototype. > >> > as soon as you upgrade to jsf 2.2 you will have to refactor some > >> > parts, > >> if > >> > you are using the api manually. > >> > > >> > fyi: codi isn't bound to jee6. all you need is the cdi > >> > implementation of your choice (in case of codi v1.0.1+ and owb > >> > 1.1.1+ you can even use java > >> > 1.5) > >> > > >> > regards, > >> > gerhard > >> > > >> > http://www.irian.at > >> > > >> > Your JSF powerhouse - > >> > JSF Consulting, Development and > >> > Courses in English and German > >> > > >> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > 2011/8/18 Hampus Wingren <[email protected]> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Hi, > >> >> I´ve seen that you´re doing some prototyping for window > >> >> sessions/ids for the JSF 2.2 spec. Is there any chance that you > >> >> would make that available as an extension to the MyFaces Core > >> >> dist for JSF 2.x? I think that it´s a killer feature but we > >> >> don´t have the luxury to move to JEE 6 for the CODI stuff. > >> >> Best regards, > >> >> Hampus > >> > >> > >
