It made no difference for me / Karl
On 4 March 2014 15:52, Karl Kildén <[email protected]> wrote: > Nice spot, In my production environment I changed it but I will test that > aspect in the template project > > > On 4 March 2014 15:50, Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Karl Kildén <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Everyone, this is how I reproduced it in a test project: >> > >> > >> > - Cloned Gerhards template >> > project:https://github.com/os890/javaweb-cdi-ds-project-template >> > >> >> hmmmm, >> >> examining the faces-config.xml, i see 2.0 specified instead of 2.1 (or >> 2.2). >> >> <faces-config version="2.0" >> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"; >> xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"; >> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; >> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee >> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-facesconfig_2_0.xsd";> >> >> </faces-config> >> >> >> When MyFaces 2.2 was released, i don't think I saw any mention of a >> 'requirement' to update faces-config, accordingly, but it would be nice to >> know if faces-config.xml has to be updated with '2.2' or 2.1. >> > >
