Hi, On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:33:08 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > Hi, > > > Is replication really a feature that a file system should implement? I > > think it should be implemented one layer below the fs. If one needs a > > replicated file system, there are things like drbd (distributed > > replicated block device). > > yes, the task is similar to what drbd does. But for nightly incremental > backup, drbd would be overkill. It's called "RAID1 over network"! Rsync is > slow and consumes much CPU. Incremental backup software can't cope with > big files AFAIK. Nilfs could fill that gap perfectly. > > - Have database / virtual machines / etc. on nilfs > - Do a nightly or hourly "nsync" to a remote mirror > > Regards, > > Pierre Beck
"nsync" sounds nice! Regards, Ryusuke Konishi _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
