Hi, On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:14:48 +0000, Alex Bitney <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Ryusuke Konishi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:44:37 +0900 (JST), Ryusuke Konishi < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Let me add one thing. Since the bind-mount and original r/w-mount > > share the same device, only one cleanerd is enough for them. (In > > fact, two cleanerds conflict with one another). So, we can give over > > the GC functionality to the original mount point without incident. > > > Just a question; why can't you use single cleaner? It would detect all > mounted partitions and perform needed tasks, maybe in parallel, as needed.
Well, single (shared) cleanerd approach indeed sounds better in the long term. The merit of the current pid and signal based (individual cleaner) approach is its simplicity. So, I think we should make the shift to the single cleaner approach if things get unmanageable within the current way. The reason why we are not using the shared cleaner, is just we took the present way when we first designed it. Regards, Ryusuke Konishi _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
