Hi, On Mon, 11 May 2009 17:32:48 +0200, Milos Jana wrote: > The first patch modifies the file /fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c, while NILFS 2.0.12 and > current git version have this file located under the path /fs/ioctl.c. > Anyway, I have replaced all strings "/fs/nilfs/" with "/fs/", which allowed > me to apply the first patch, but the second one and compilation failed: > > $ patch -p1 < patch1.patch > patching file fs/ioctl.c > Hunk #6 succeeded at 572 (offset -2 lines). > Hunk #7 succeeded at 606 (offset -2 lines). > > $ patch -p1 < patch2.patch > patching file fs/ioctl.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 25. > Hunk #5 FAILED at 432. > Hunk #6 succeeded at 448 (offset -2 lines). > Hunk #7 succeeded at 469 (offset -2 lines). > Hunk #8 succeeded at 478 (offset -2 lines). > Hunk #9 succeeded at 486 (offset -2 lines). > Hunk #10 succeeded at 506 (offset -2 lines). > 2 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/ioctl.c.rej > patching file fs/nilfs.h > Hunk #1 succeeded at 245 (offset 9 lines). > patching file fs/segment.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 2789 (offset 200 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 2807 (offset 200 lines). > patching file fs/segment.h
<snip> Sorry for confusing you. These patches I have recently posted on this mailing list is not against out-of-tree modules but against linux-2.6.30-rc5 (i.e. Linus' kernel tree). And, these will not solve your problem. I'll apply corresponding patches to the nilfs2-module git tree after Linus merged into the mainline. Regards, Ryusuke Konishi _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
