On Fri, 15 May 2009 09:21:43 +0900 (JST), Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2009 19:39:16 +0200, "Michael Niederle" wrote: > > The todo-list mentions that more copies of the superblock are needed. I > > strongly agree! I think this should be one of the top items on the > > todo-list. > > > > Greetings, Michael > > The latest nilfs already has secondary super block in tail of > partition. But it looks insufficient for this pendrive problem. > > I think ensuring write on unmount should come before that.
Just a quick note. The write on unmount is already _DONE_ on the source code. I here mean some enhanced operation like diskcache flushing. Ryusuke Konishi _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
