Hi, I've been copying data to a 700 GiB nilfs2 volume from a fast disk for 2.5 hours now. df -h shows there's only 37 GiB of data there:
/dev/mapper/lacie 699G 37G 628G 6% /media/lacie
Yet running du -csh in one big directory in /media/lacie at the same
time shows disk usage to be 62G in that directory alone.
Are the df figures somehow inaccurate for nilfs2 volumes?
I'm using the version of nilfs2 in stock 2.6.30 kernel.
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
