Hi

At Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:13:48 +0900 (JST),
Ryusuke Konishi wrote:

> Hi,
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:14:35 +0900, Jiro SEKIBA <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Oops!
> > 
> > Sorry for the trivial error.
> > 
> > Here is a new patch to meet the coding style(I hope).
> > 
> > thanks
> > 
> > regards,
> > -- 
> > Jiro SEKIBA <[email protected]>
> > 
> >  Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA <[email protected]>
> > 
> > ---
> >  fs/nilfs2/super.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/super.c b/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> > index ab785f8..aa6b881 100644
> > --- a/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> > @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@
> >  #include <linux/writeback.h>
> >  #include <linux/kobject.h>
> >  #include <linux/exportfs.h>
> > +#include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > +#include <linux/mount.h>
> >  #include "nilfs.h"
> >  #include "mdt.h"
> >  #include "alloc.h"
> > @@ -537,6 +539,28 @@ static int nilfs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct 
> > kstatfs *buf)
> >     return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int nilfs_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct vfsmount *vfs)
> > +{
> > +   struct super_block *sb = vfs->mnt_sb;
> > +   struct nilfs_sb_info *sbi = NILFS_SB(sb);
> > +
> > +   if (!nilfs_test_opt(sbi, BARRIER))
> > +           seq_printf(seq, ",barrier=off");
> > +   if (nilfs_test_opt(sbi, SNAPSHOT))
> > +           seq_printf(seq, ",cp=%llu",
> > +                   (unsigned long long int)sbi->s_snapshot_cno);
> > +   if (nilfs_test_opt(sbi, ERRORS_CONT))
> > +           seq_printf(seq, ",errors=continue");
> > +   if (nilfs_test_opt(sbi, ERRORS_RO))
> > +           seq_printf(seq, ",errors=remount-ro");
> > +   if (nilfs_test_opt(sbi, ERRORS_PANIC))
> > +           seq_printf(seq, ",errors=panic");
> > +   if (nilfs_test_opt(sbi, STRICT_ORDER))
> > +           seq_printf(seq, ",order=strict");
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct super_operations nilfs_sops = {
> >     .alloc_inode    = nilfs_alloc_inode,
> >     .destroy_inode  = nilfs_destroy_inode,
> > @@ -554,7 +578,7 @@ static struct super_operations nilfs_sops = {
> >     .remount_fs     = nilfs_remount,
> >     .clear_inode    = nilfs_clear_inode,
> >     /* .umount_begin */
> > -   /* .show_options */
> > +   .show_options = nilfs_show_options
> >  };
> >  
> >  static struct inode *
> > -- 
> > 1.5.6.5
> > 
> 
> Looks good to me!
> 
> I've tested the patch. One thing, I noticed that the "errors=continue"
> option looks verbose in default mode.  We don't have to emphasize such
> a subsidiary option when it is selected by default.  I think the
> "errors=continue" option is just the case.

OK, make sense to me.

> So, I removed the corresponding part as I attached below.
> 
> I'll queue it for 2.6.32.
> 
> Thank you for your help.
> 
> Ryusuke Konishi
> ---
> From: Jiro SEKIBA <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:06:34 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: implement nilfs_show_options to display mount 
> options in /proc/mounts
> 
> This is a patch to display mount options in procfs.
> Mount options will show up in the /proc/mounts as other fs does.
> 
> ...
> /dev/sda6 /mnt nilfs2 ro,relatime,barrier=off,cp=3,order=strict 0 0
> ...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/nilfs2/super.c |   24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/super.c b/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> index ab785f8..0b09569 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@
>  #include <linux/writeback.h>
>  #include <linux/kobject.h>
>  #include <linux/exportfs.h>
> +#include <linux/seq_file.h>
> +#include <linux/mount.h>
>  #include "nilfs.h"
>  #include "mdt.h"
>  #include "alloc.h"
> @@ -537,6 +539,26 @@ static int nilfs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct 
> kstatfs *buf)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int nilfs_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct vfsmount *vfs)
> +{
> +     struct super_block *sb = vfs->mnt_sb;
> +     struct nilfs_sb_info *sbi = NILFS_SB(sb);
> +
> +     if (!nilfs_test_opt(sbi, BARRIER))
> +             seq_printf(seq, ",barrier=off");
> +     if (nilfs_test_opt(sbi, SNAPSHOT))
> +             seq_printf(seq, ",cp=%llu",
> +                        (unsigned long long int)sbi->s_snapshot_cno);
> +     if (nilfs_test_opt(sbi, ERRORS_RO))
> +             seq_printf(seq, ",errors=remount-ro");
> +     if (nilfs_test_opt(sbi, ERRORS_PANIC))
> +             seq_printf(seq, ",errors=panic");
> +     if (nilfs_test_opt(sbi, STRICT_ORDER))
> +             seq_printf(seq, ",order=strict");
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static struct super_operations nilfs_sops = {
>       .alloc_inode    = nilfs_alloc_inode,
>       .destroy_inode  = nilfs_destroy_inode,
> @@ -554,7 +576,7 @@ static struct super_operations nilfs_sops = {
>       .remount_fs     = nilfs_remount,
>       .clear_inode    = nilfs_clear_inode,
>       /* .umount_begin */
> -     /* .show_options */
> +     .show_options = nilfs_show_options
>  };
>  
>  static struct inode *
> -- 
> 1.6.2

looks good

thanks

regards,
-- 
Jiro SEKIBA <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to