Hi, Thank you for the comments!
At Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:24:14 +0900 (JST), Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > The nilfs_update_super() sounds like a function to do update operation > on the super block. > > How about nilfs_sb_need_update() or so? ok, looks better. > And then, this patch has some style problems. Applying checkpatch.pl > can save a bit of time. Grr. I might send the wrong one. I'll revise the patch and resend it again. regards, -- Jiro SEKIBA <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
