2009/7/26 havuz goz <[email protected]>: > Let me elaborate: If the OS was optimized so that it cached > frequently-accessed and modified small files in ram, it would provide a much > more responsive user experience. Maybe a fork of NILFS will support this? Or > optional modes?
That's the work of VFS. It already happens. A fs must be rocksolid, than you can worry about speed (well, it's another story if you accept to lost data, but in the fastest way)... Anyway, if speed is your worry (but not so much the integrity), you can use a SSD. Bye, Andrea _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
