On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Ryusuke Konishi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Prasenjit Giri, and Reinoud,
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:26:19 +0200, Reinoud Zandijk <wrote:
> > Hi Prasenjit Giri,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:46:04AM +0530, Prasenjit Giri wrote:
> > > Even after looking through various sites, forums, mailing lists I could
> not
> > > uncover the present directoy management of NILFS2.
> > >
> > > As I see a B-tree directory management in your long term to do list, it
> > > would be really nice if someone would ought to share the information
> > > regarding the present directory management of NILFS2
> >
> > Currently directories are recorded just as a sequential file but not
> filled
> > with user data but with dirent entries in their blocks like ext2fs does.
> > Nothing special about that :)
> >
> > I dont know if b+tree directory management would be preferable though.
> With
> > some smart caching all directory operations can be made O(1) anyway.
> >
> > With regards,
> > Reinoud Zandijk
>
> Yes, directory is a file and it's already managed with b-tree like
> other files.  However, the current directory design is not O(log n),
> and is actually slow especially for file creation.
>
> So, it leaves room for considering the true "b-tree directory
> management".
>
> OTOH, the replacement has the following points to notice:
>
>  1) It may complicate the log writer.
>
>    The current log writer is designed on the basis that every data
>    and meta data is a file.  In NILFS, inodes, segment usage state,
>    and checkpoints, are managed with correponding meta-data files.
>
>    The true "b-tree directory management" may break this uniformity.
>
>  2) A disk format change is required.
>    (We can deem this a trade-off at this stage)
>
> This may be a -v3 material.  But anyway, patch proposals are welcome.
>
> Thank you,
> Ryusuke Konishi
>



Hello Reinoud Zandijk, Ryusuke Konishi

This has been more than helpful as I was at complete lost. But with this new
side of it could you explain the quoted, " --- true 'b-tree directory
management' --- ".

I've on this mail list, looking for ideas that would be feasible for an
undergrad project -- though this adds a very unpleasant twist.

Is writable snapshot feasible ? If so, is there an abstract for this
purpose? Is it doable in a years time?

Or could you all please suggest an alternative on such grounds.
With regards,
Prasenjit Giri
Rajesh D. Yadav
Ashwin Goel
Sunil V. Chitkote


-- 
Prasenjit Giri
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to