Jérôme Poulin wrote: > On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Jeff Layton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Jérôme Poulin wrote: >> >> Cool program - I will definitely try this. >> >> So, let me summarize what I think I should do to test nilfs with >> IOzone without the impact of the checkpoints and without filling >> up the space. >> >> - Run IOzone without cleanerd running to minimize the >> impact of checkpoints on IO performance. >> - Assuming I don't fill up the file system, after a run of >> IOzone, I need to run cleanerd but put the protection >> period to something very small (e.g. 1 second) to reclaim the >> space. >> - Shut down cleanerd again and run another IOzone test. >> (rinse and repeat) >> >> Does this sound about right? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Jeff >> >> > That sounds right, either run cleanerd or mkfs the partition again for > faster results ;) >
Good point about using mkfs. :) I think I'm going to run two test: (1) using the process above, (2) setting the protection period to 1 (maybe 0). Let's see what the differences are. Thanks! Jeff _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
