Mark:

We'll definitely consider porting to Geronimo itself...right now we
have a lot of folks asking about running EJB 3 on Tomcat and OpenEJB
seems the most promising solution. Embeddable JBoss is still in Alpha
(has been for six months now)...

I am in touch with the EasyBeans folks too though...it looks like its
reached a stable state in terms of EJB 3 support and documentation...

Incidentally, our book does cover porting from EJB 2.1 to 3.0 (entire
chapter on it)....

Cheers,
Reza

On 9/10/07, Mark Aufdencamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Reza,
>
> Lurking here on the List, as it doesn't get much traffic.  Most OpenEJB
> users are probably utilizing it via the Geronimo project rather than
> standalone.  You might want to check it's user and developer list, as
> well as the OpenJPA project.
>
> I'd personally be really interested in seeing your examples ported to
> Geronimo 2 which supports EJB 3 standards via the OpenEJB and OpenJPA
> components.
>
> I've been using Geronimo 1.1.1 with EJB 2.1 CMP and CMR.  I'm getting
> ready to start some porting and could really use a good tutorial prior
> to undertaking the port from 2.1 to 3.0.
>
> Mark Aufdencamp
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Hello from EJB 3 in Action!
> > From: "Reza Rahman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Mon, September 10, 2007 2:25 pm
> > To: [email protected]
> >
> > Hi:
> >
> > I am the co-author of EJB 3 in Action from Manning press. I am
> > considering porting the example code to Tomcat/OpenEJB and make it
> > available from the book's site http://www.manning.com/panda/.
> >
> > I am wondering what the current status of EJB 3 support is though...I
> > downloaded the 1.0 version of the code, looking at it briefly looks
> > like EJB 3.0 is not yet supported and there are no EJB 3 samples
> > included.
> >
> > Am I wrong? If I am right, when do you guys envision including EJB 3.0
> > support as a regular download? I hate to include something for the
> > book that still has a "beta" feel to it...it really doesn't look too
> > good...
> >
> > Any guidance would be highly appreciated...
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Reza
>
>

Reply via email to