Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007 3:04 PM, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2) My source code, specifically the definition of CompanyAdminLocal,
CompanyAdminReport, and CompanyAdminImpl match the injection example.
That's correct, but the class - MyTestClass - that uses the local,
remote and impl (?) interfaces is not considered as DI target and
openejb (and any ejb3 container) doesn't inject ejbs into it.
I am trying to access the many forms of the EJB, some may be incorrect
an need to be removed from the test.
Since the test is using OpenEJB as an embedded server, why is the test
class not considered as a DI target?
My intent is to test the EJB in the same manor as an application would
use the EJB. This includes the use of DI. Is my implementation
consistent with my intent?
<snip>
Jacel
Paul Spencer
