On Mar 4, 2008, at 1:32 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
David I have 2 questions
1- Apache replied with NO on that JSR, Will this affect our
implementation of EJB3.1 in OpenEJB ?
No. The issue there is primarily around unfair "field of use"
restrictions on some JSRs, namely Java SE. IIUC, it affects Apache
Harmony and that is what they are trying to change. If you read the
vote comments, nearly all the vendors express the same concern.
2- Do you need more people in JSR318 (EJB 3.1) Expert Group, as I am
applying for the JSPA these days ???
It's all up to Ken, the spec lead. When you have that worked out you
can apply here: http://jcp.org/en/jsr/egnom?id=318
-David
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:10 AM, David Blevins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI to all out there, we on the EJB 3.1 Expert Group have put up a
Early Draft of the EJB 3.1 specification.
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/edr/jsr318/index.html
The review will be open till March 30, 2008.
-David
--
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
