Thank you Dain for your reactivity. I'm out of my office traveling and having meetings for two days. A colleague has done some tests which confirms that your fix is OK. I've planned to confirm by doing my own tests on Thursday.
Dain Sundstrom wrote: > > I think I have finally fixed this issue. Can you retest and let me > know if it is working for you? > > Thanks, > > -dain > > On Jun 16, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > >> On Jun 13, 2008, at 8:43 AM, jfjames wrote: >> >>> My intention was to find an alternative to DBCP ready to be used in >>> production with OpenEJB. Since it doesn't exist, I have to change >>> my mind. >>> If you agree to commit our patch quickly, I'm OK to use DBCP in >>> production. >> >> Quick status update. I started working on the patch, but it isn't >> as simple as applying it.... When it comes to the DelegateConnection >> class, it should appear to the user to be an plain old Connection >> without any special pooling properties. This mean that when the >> DelegateConnection is closed, it must appear to the caller that the >> connection is actually closed, so methods like isClosed should >> return true. >> >> Instead of changing the isClosed method, I'll change the reallyClose >> method so it only checks the real connection before closing. >> >> -dain > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DataSource-configuration-for-production-tp17695975p17913044.html Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
