Hi David, I was wondering about your note on the JNDI impl:
> > JNDI implementation > > Not easily. In Tomcat we use Tomcat's JNDI impl, in Geronimo we use > Geronimo's impl, but it's tricky to pull off. Can you elaborate a bit on that? I mean, JNDI has a well-defined SPI so it shouldn't be that tricky to achieve this, isn't it? Furthermore, as long as Geronimo uses OpenEJB as its EJB container, and can use Tomcat as its web container, they should be made possible to use a common JNDI provider in Geronimo. Now, AFAIK standalone Tomcat uses the org.apache.naming impl (http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/naming/) while Geronimo comes with xbean-naming (http://geronimo.apache.org/xbean/). OpenEJB seems to have its own JNDI impl although I noticed the xbean-naming bundle inside as well. Is the above correct or am I totally missing something here? Thank you in advance! recursion. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Flexability-of-OpenEJB-integration-tp24049853p25081540.html Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
