Archive it. Or if you get a cycle to help add to the docs (or blog
about it), that helps too :)
-David
On Oct 19, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Quintin Beukes wrote:
Is this documented on the web site - just want to determine if I can
delete this mail or archive it?
Quintin Beukes
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:58 AM, David Blevins
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Oct 10, 2009, at 3:27 AM, Quintin Beukes wrote:
Hey,
I read a thread on OpenEJBs performance (http://is.gd/4bMYZ), and
that's a major improvement, ending up in truly great performance. I
don't believe in comparative benchmarks as a "say-it-all judge-all",
but when I had performance issues on Glassfish I was looking for
ways
to strip it down to make it faster, and in the process found that
people weren't even getting above 1000 txs/second.And these were
with
empty session beans, purely testing the creation/destruction and
turnaround of the remote EJB protocol/setup.
I just want to confirm something. If I find I need the performance
increase when my clients increase to close to/over a hundred, I
should
change the java.naming.provider.url property to
"http://localhost:4204/ejb";, from the alternative
"ejbd://localhost:4201" ? This will then be what is mentioned in the
thread, ie. the http over jetty code setup?
Right. That and you need to add the jetty jars to lib/. We will
detect it
on startup and magically use the jetty http impl instead of our own
http
impl which is really just for testing.
-David
