Hi
joe-2 wrote: > > I am quite new to OpenEJB and EJB3 in general, so many things are > nebulous for me. > Welcome :) joe-2 wrote: > > I guessed to make an EJB locally testable it has to implement an > interface annotated with @Local. > Before EJB 3.1, @local was not required. If you have a bean implementing a single interface, the container will assume it's the local interface. If you implement more than one interface, you have to explicitly add the @Local annotation. Since EJB 3.1, a bean is not required to implement an interface (@local or @remote). As you already noticed, some details are available at http://openejb.apache.org/3.0/simple-stateless-example.html http://openejb.apache.org/3.0/simple-stateless-example.html . joe-2 wrote: > > But it seems i am wrong. My EJBs methods are also invokeable even if > they implement an interface annotated > with @Remote. > > So in general Remote-EJBs are locally invokeable? if yes whats the > @Local for? > Just to make EJB methods not invokeable for remote clients? > > in the "Simple Stateless Example" > (http://openejb.apache.org/3.0/simple-stateless-example.html) > two interfaces (with identical signatures) are used one with implicit > @Local and one with @Remote annotation. > Why, maybe some use case? > Can't remember if the spec clearly defines that point. Jean-Louis -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/testing-Local-Remote-tp1474295p1474348.html Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
