Hi On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Anthony Fryer <[email protected]> wrote:
> i come from a weblogic background having used it for years. Now days i much > much prefer openejb/tomee. Other ejb containers are memory pigs by > comparison, have slow boot times and are impossible to embed and use for > unit testing. They do have more fully featured admin consoles and > docUmentation though but i can live without that. I have been using tomee > in production for over a year now and am happy with the performance and > reliability but more importantly, happy that i can run it on a debian linux > virtual server with only 512mb of ram and have 130mb free. i couldnt even > boot up empty instances of other containers on my server without running > out > of memory and that includes jboss and glassfish. Openejb and the much > improved ejb3 spec should regain ground lost to spring during the days of > ejb2 and fat containers. > Well said about the ground lost for Spring :) But David asked a question in this thread which is actually very important from different users as a feedback: - What features users would like to have besides OEJB being lightweight and easy to use in different modes ? I am really interested to know that from users out there. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/ejb-from-ws-tp4470387p4476450.html > Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein
