IIRC it is done in JndiBuilder (in container/openejb-core)

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau*
*Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com*




2012/9/18 David Nordahl <[email protected]>

> I'll give that a try.. On that note, what is a way to debug these kind of
> messages:
>
> javax.naming.**NameNotFoundException: Name "UserFacadeLocal" not found.
>
> As in, how can I see what names are registered?
>
>
>
>
> On 09/17/2012 03:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>> hmm
>>
>> i saw some exception swallowed some days before, i think it is fixed on
>> trunk and in the branch we'll use for the release but not sure it is
>> deployed.
>>
>> another check you can do is to valid your datasource config through JMX
>>
>> if not please share a sample (mvn project is perfect) to let us reproduce
>> the issue
>>
>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau*
>> *Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.**com<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com>
>> *
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2012/9/17 David Nordahl <[email protected]>
>>
>>  At last I have faces deploying, but the persistence link isn't there and
>>> I'm not getting any error messages that I can find regarding why.
>>>  Attached
>>> is the startup log which includes the messages returned when trying to
>>> add
>>> an entity through a faces form.
>>>
>>> It seems like db access or the persistence module is simply not working,
>>> but I don't see anything in the startup log, and the only thing it says
>>> trying to run the faces form is 'null', and that's only on log level
>>> fine.
>>>
>>>  From a previous thread, it seemed that me and another user both
>>> experienced that an unsupported annotation attribute (in our case
>>> @Basic(optional=false) in an EJB was able to mysteriously cripple
>>> functionality with no corresponding error messages anywhere. Has this
>>> issue
>>> been addressed or does a bug report need to be created? After
>>> regenerating
>>> my ejbs with a lot more DB attributes and constraints in place there are
>>> a
>>> lot more kinds of annotations and attributes than I had before.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to