Okay, and hey sorry again for being n00b, but what does OWB means?

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Alex,
>
> we are waiting the OWB release (should be under vote pretty quickly, just
> one or two classes to fix before running the vote)
>
> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> *Twitter: @rmannibucau*
> *Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com*
> *LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/romain-manni-bucau/43/544/956*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/9/23 Alex The Rocker <[email protected]>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Just wondering if a release candidate of next TomEE release is planned
> soon
> > ?
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Alex The Rocker <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > David:
> > >
> > > Thank you very much for your clear answer, it's alright : I understand
> > > that you're doing best effort to get 1.1.0 done for JavaOne,  I guess
> > that
> > > even if it's not ready at this time it could be available early
> october.
> > > I'm going to take the risk and bet on it for our project (time to have
> > guts)
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 3:43 AM, David Blevins <
> [email protected]
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> We're hacking on the release now, it'll be a scramble to get it done
> by
> > >> the end of the month but should be doable.  No Apache project can
> > actually
> > >> guarantee a date due to voting -- it takes a minimum of 3 days per
> > Apache
> > >> bylaws and can't be closed till certain conditions are met -- such as
> > >> getting enough votes.  As it's a volunteer organization and difficult
> to
> > >> get people's time, we typically get last minute feedback that requires
> > new
> > >> binaries and a new vote and another 3 days.
> > >>
> > >> So the best I can say is we're trying very hard to get it out before
> > >> JavaOne / end of the month.
> > >>
> > >> As that sounds very scary, as a point of reference, we were in this
> same
> > >> position last year and made the "before JavaOne" date.  We got our
> > *first*
> > >> ever 100% TCK pass on September 23rd (cutting it very close) and were
> > able
> > >> to get a release out and announcement ready by JavaOne.
> > >>
> > >> If we're able to get a vote started by mid week, we should be able to
> > >> make it by end of the month no problem.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -David
> > >>
> > >> On Sep 15, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Alex The Rocker wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Anyone here knowing TomEE/TomEE+ 1.1.0 targeted date for "general
> > >> > availability" ?
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Alex The Rocker <
> > [email protected]
> > >> >wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Okay, I don't mind if the next release is called 1.1.0 instead of
> > >> 1.0.1.
> > >> >> However, do care to know whether or not it's still scheduled for
> this
> > >> >> month & before JavaOne:
> > >> >> the application for which I'm lobbying a change from Tomcat to
> TomEE+
> > >> is
> > >> >> currently in final phase
> > >> >> for prerequisites define. They want to add REST façade, and I saw
> in
> > >> TomEE
> > >> >> 1.0.1 release notes
> > >> >> (here:
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12321242
> > >> )
> > >> >> that
> > >> >> there was a fix on the JAX-WS + JAX-RS cohexistence in a same web
> > app.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> If TomEE 1.1.0 come too late (ie after September), then they'll
> > reject
> > >> >> TomEE+ and choose instead
> > >> >> to stay with Tomcat and use Jersey for JAX-RS, which would make a
> > >> TomEE+
> > >> >> "win-back" hard
> > >> >> (I saw some threads about Jersey annoyances when deploying such
> apps
> > to
> > >> >> TomEE+)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Baseline : what's the target date for 1.1.0 GA (General
> > Availability) ?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Alex
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> Yeah, i think 1.0.1 will never be released
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Npt = not from a phone ;)
> > >> >>> Le 14 sept. 2012 21:24, "Alex The Rocker" <[email protected]>
> a
> > >> écrit
> > >> >>> :
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> Call me n00b if you want, but I don't catch it: do you mean that
> > next
> > >> >>>> release due for JavaOne (end of this month) is 1.1.0 ?
> > >> >>>> If otherwise it's still 1.0.1, then why couldn't there be a
> refresh
> > >> of
> > >> >>>> 1.0.1 snapshot?
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> (and btw, what do you mean by npt? I utfm but wtf, no hit ;)
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Alex
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >> >>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>> Hi,
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> The snapshot is the 1.1.0 (npt 1.0.1). The rc will probably be
> > >> skipped
> > >> >>>> (we
> > >> >>>>> had CI issues this week and lost some days on it :(). btw we
> need
> > >> the
> > >> >>>>> snapshot for the end of the month.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> We currently wait an openwebbeans new version then we should be
> > able
> > >> >>> to
> > >> >>>>> release
> > >> >>>>> Le 14 sept. 2012 20:58, "Alex The Rocker" <[email protected]
> >
> > a
> > >> >>>> écrit
> > >> >>>>> :
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Hello,
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> I saw in dev list that a 1.0.1 release candidate should be
> > >> available
> > >> >>>> this
> > >> >>>>>> week, is that still the plan?
> > >> >>>>>> I had a look to your (useful) link with snapshots builds.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Unfortunately, for 1.0.1 there is not recent snapshot here:
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.1-SNAPSHOT/
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> The most recent one is dated 7th of June.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> In 1.0.1 snapshots repository, there are more recent build, but
> > >> >>> since
> > >> >>>>> 1.0.1
> > >> >>>>>> is planned before JavaOne (this month I understand), I think
> it's
> > >> >>> safer
> > >> >>>>> to
> > >> >>>>>> target 1.0.1 a prerequisite for an application to be moved from
> > >> >>> Tomcat
> > >> >>>> to
> > >> >>>>>> TomEE+.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Would you please update 1.0.1 snapshot (unless a RC is actually
> > for
> > >> >>>>> current
> > >> >>>>>> wekk) ?
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >> >>>>>> Alex
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >> >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> I hope a rc next week.
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> I wrote a post to get the snapshot:
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/2012/05/23/getting-tomee-snapshot/
> > >> >>>>>>> Le 8 sept. 2012 09:44, "Alex The Rocker" <
> [email protected]>
> > a
> > >> >>>>> écrit
> > >> >>>>>> :
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks guys,
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Based on David's answer and given that JavaOne begins end of
> > >> >>>>>> september, I
> > >> >>>>>>>> guess we can hope for a generally available 1.0.1 at this
> time,
> > >> >>>>> right?
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> However, I see no 1.0.1-alpha or 1.0.1-beta on the official
> > >> >>> TomEE
> > >> >>>>>>> download
> > >> >>>>>>>> page.
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> May I suggest that -even if not everything is ironed for
> 1.0.1-
> > >> >>>> you
> > >> >>>>>> guys
> > >> >>>>>>>> post on TomEE download page links to alpha/beta/release
> > >> >>> candidate
> > >> >>>>>>> (whatever
> > >> >>>>>>>> makes sense) builds of "current stable" TomEE and TomEE+, for
> > >> >>> the
> > >> >>>>> rest
> > >> >>>>>> of
> > >> >>>>>>>> us who aren't quite at ease with poking into source code
> > >> >>>>> repositories?
> > >> >>>>>>> (I'm
> > >> >>>>>>>> don't even know from where to start, I had a look to
> > >> >>>>> support/github...
> > >> >>>>>>> and
> > >> >>>>>>>> got lost)
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> I love Eclipse download site, where nightly builds can be
> > >> >>>> downloaded
> > >> >>>>> at
> > >> >>>>>>> any
> > >> >>>>>>>> time, do we have something like this coming for TomEE/TomEE+
> ?
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> TomEE's great, I bet it will have more audience if such
> > >> >>>> improvements
> > >> >>>>>>>> (including a roadmap) could be provided on its home page.
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Alex
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > >> >>>>>>> [email protected]
> > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> We should do it when owb will use asm instead of javassist
> > >> >>> IMO (I
> > >> >>>>>> have
> > >> >>>>>>>> some
> > >> >>>>>>>>> minor fixes to push next week too but should be quick)
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> I know David is hacking on it, i can help if needed.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> We just should take care of iwb release time
> > >> >>>>>>>>> Le 8 sept. 2012 01:52, "David Blevins" <
> > >> >>> [email protected]>
> > >> >>>> a
> > >> >>>>>>>> écrit :
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> I think it's pretty critical to get a release out before
> > >> >>>> JavaOne,
> > >> >>>>>>> which
> > >> >>>>>>>>> is
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> just weeks away.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Might be tricky, but I think we can do it.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> -David
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 7, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Jeremyau wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm really interested about this question as well since
> > >> >>> there
> > >> >>>>> is
> > >> >>>>>> a
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> couple of
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> issues that have been fixed. (Hibernate, Grails...) Has
> > >> >>>> someone
> > >> >>>>>> an
> > >> >>>>>>>> idea
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> about that?
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Next-TomEE-release-date-tp4657315p4657331.html
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at
> > >> >>>> Nabble.com.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to