added some more info + my opinion

maybe the thread should be pushed to dev@ now, no?

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*




2012/10/6 Alex The Rocker <[email protected]>

> Security isn't an option.
> JIRA improvement item created, see:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-450
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > i thought starting a thread on it after next release but up to you, jira
> > works too
> >
> > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/10/6 Alex The Rocker <[email protected]>
> >
> > > Want me to fill a JIRA for it ?
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > [email protected]
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > hmm
> > > >
> > > > kind of profile can make sense
> > > >
> > > > probably something to think about for v 1.6
> > > >
> > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2012/10/6 Alex The Rocker <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > > Romain:
> > > > >
> > > > > I think TomEE should be "secure by default", so commenting the
> > default
> > > > > users sound good to me.
> > > > > For developers vs production use cases, I think it would be great
> to
> > > > have a
> > > > > "configurator command" to swtich from "developer" vs. "production"
> > > > > configuration profiles.
> > > > > (IBM WebSphere has this feature, in Profile Management Tool)
> > > > >
> > > > > Alex.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i think the question is open and i scare a debate without end on
> > this
> > > > > > topic.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why i didn't comment it: because the moment where you need it the
> > > most
> > > > > > often is during the development so no issue having it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In production i hope it is adapted (and maybe tomcat-users.xml is
> > not
> > > > > used
> > > > > > at all) so i thought it was not an issue.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's said if *everybody *thinks it should be as Tomcat
> commented
> > i
> > > > see
> > > > > no
> > > > > > big issue doing it
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > > > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > > > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > > > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > > > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2012/10/6 exabrial <[email protected]>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > In apache-tomee-webprofile-1.5.0/conf/tomcat-users.xml, the
> > > following
> > > > > > users
> > > > > > > are defined:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   <role rolename="tomee-admin"/>
> > > > > > >   <user password="tomee" roles="tomee-admin,manager-gui"
> > > > > > username="tomee"/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Wouldn't it be better to have those commented out by default?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/v1-5-0-Security-concern-tp4657814.html
> > > > > > > Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to