no issue at all in pax, we just dont scan it because we know we'll find nothing in it so no need to loose IO time scanning it (just a perf optim)
BTW on trunk your sample should work out of the box *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2012/10/12 Harald Wellmann <[email protected]> > I'm not aware of anything in Pax URL that might interfere with Java EE > annotation scanning - what exactly is the problem you're trying to > avoid? > > Once we know what it is, we can try removing it from Pax URL. > > Best regards, > Harald > > 2012/10/12 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > > hi, > > > > i updated it yesterday (restricted to pax-url) > > > > btw, it is common for such framework to allow to rename libs to sthg else > > for such a reason >
