right but you can specify the url in the application.xml

then it should be in the logs under the lines ----------------------------

Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2012/12/17 José Luis Cetina <[email protected]>:
> Ok, thanks.
>
> I deploy my ear manually but how can i acces to my webapp? i mean what url
> i have to use? in tomee (tomcat) manager my ear/war inst in the list i
> guess because is an ear file.
>
>
> 2012/12/17 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
>
>> they said yes (jar, war, ear) but personally i never deploy through an
>> IDE so not sure sorry :s
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2012/12/17 José Luis Cetina <[email protected]>:
>> > Romain is IntellijIDEA fun integration with TomEE? I mean can
>> IntellijIDEA
>> > can run ear "apps" in TomEE.
>> >
>> > I cant do that with netbeans, because netbeans dont recognize TomEE as a
>> > JEE6 App Server, and this is a problem to me, because i need to use an
>> ear
>> > but i have to deploy the file manually and in production environment
>> thats
>> > a problem because when we do some changes in xhtml files we have to
>> > "redeploy" the ear file.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012/12/15 José Luis Cetina <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >> I will consider seriously to use an ear. I think will be more easy.
>> >>
>> >> The only inconvenient is that netbeans dont recognize tomee as a full
>> jee
>> >> 6 app server and dont permit to deploy ear files with tomee.
>> >>
>> >> I will have run a little plugin that i did for copy the ear file to apps
>> >> folder.
>> >>
>> >> I hope some day netbeans can have full tomee support.
>> >>  El dic 15, 2012 2:49 PM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]>
>> >> escribió:
>> >>
>> >> well it works because the classloader of apps/yourjar will delegate to
>> >>> lib but that's just a side effect IMO (would be wrong for a webapp).
>> >>>
>> >>> the fix will be tomorrow in tomee 1.5.2-SNAPSHOT
>> >>>
>> >>> about the ear...after the first start it will be unpacked then webapp
>> >>> will be unpacked too so finally what do you have? all is exploded and
>> >>> match your need ;). You can even create this fake hierarchy yourself,
>> >>> just ensure you have an application.xml
>> >>>
>> >>> does it match better your need this way?
>> >>>
>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2012/12/15 José Luis Cetina <[email protected]>:
>> >>> > As a note you recommend to me to drop my jar file to apps and to lib.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Do you have any other advice?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 2012/12/15 José Luis Cetina <[email protected]>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> I have 3 different's webapps and each of them need the same EJB's, i
>> >>> dont
>> >>> >> want to deploy as ear because when i have to some change in one
>> webapp
>> >>> i
>> >>> >> will have to deploy the ear entirely, am i okay?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> When the fix will be in repo??
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> 2012/12/15 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> ok got it
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> first before going through your sample your deployment id broken
>> >>> >>> (deployment the same class in lib + apps hoping it will be the same
>> >>> >>> localbean is assured with no guarantee (it works by side effect).
>> >>> >>> That's said i don't get why an ear is a pain since you have to
>> restart
>> >>> >>> the container whatever the part of the app your update, no?
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> then i don't understand why it doesn't work for you? it works for
>> me
>> >>> :p
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> ok ok, joking (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-658)
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> then the issue was pretty easy: EJB have their own jndi context
>> while
>> >>> >>> all other beans uses the webapp one and in the webapp one global is
>> >>> >>> merged
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Honestly i'm not sure it is a bug regarding JavaEE 6 or not (IIRC
>> >>> >>> global names can be local to an app :s)
>> >>> >>> but in all cases it should work now (since i find it more or less
>> >>> >>> logical as usage)
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> hope it doesn't break any TCK otherwise i'll need to revert it
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>> >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >>> >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >>> >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >>> >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> 2012/12/15 José Luis Cetina <[email protected]>:
>> >>> >>> > Hi Romain here is the example:
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > http://www.mediafire.com/?hz8s0b79hp4w92n
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > Inside of the zip you will see 2 maven projects, 1 is a ejbmodule
>> >>> (jar)
>> >>> >>> and
>> >>> >>> > the other a webapp module with servlets.
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > If i do a lookup from servlet to my ejb this works, but if a call
>> >>> an ejb
>> >>> >>> > (ejb module) from another ejb in my webapp this not work, you can
>> >>> see
>> >>> >>> the
>> >>> >>> > example.
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > I copy my ejb module jar to apps and lib then i deploy my webapp
>> to
>> >>> >>> test.
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > Thanks, i dont know what is happend
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > 2012/12/15 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >> Hi,
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> can you share a sample please (with a servlet to show it "doesnt
>> >>> >>> work")?
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>> >>> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >>> >>> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >>> >>> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >>> >>> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> 2012/12/15 José Luis Cetina <[email protected]>:
>> >>> >>> >> > I have this scenario:
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> > 1. EJB Module deployed in apps folder ex: MyEJB.java is a
>> >>> stateless
>> >>> >>> EJB
>> >>> >>> >> > and doesn't implement any interface.
>> >>> >>> >> > 2. Web app (JSF+EJB) deployed in webapps folder.
>> >>> >>> >> > 3. All in the same server
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> > When i want to lookup an EJB from any managedbean i do this:
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> > String lookUp =
>> >>> "java:global/myEJBModuleName/MyEJB!com.test.MyEJB";
>> >>> >>> >> > MyEJB myObject = (MyEJB) InitialContext.doLookup(lookUp);
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> > And it works.
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> > But when i try to do the same (lookup, same code above)
>> inside of
>> >>> >>> any EJB
>> >>> >>> >> > that resides in my webapp i always get a
>> >>> >>> >> > NameNotFoundException.
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> > Debuging my project i can see the nex:
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> > When i iterate from any managedbean, i can see my EJB Module,
>> but
>> >>> >>> when i
>> >>> >>> >> do
>> >>> >>> >> > the same from an EJB (that is located in webapp) i cant.
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> > //This only works when i execute it from managedbean but not
>> in
>> >>> an
>> >>> >>> EJB
>> >>> >>> >> > (from my webapp)
>> >>> >>> >> >         InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext();
>> >>> >>> >> >         NamingEnumeration<NameClassPair> list2 =
>> >>> >>> >> > ctx.list("java:global/myEJBModuleName");
>> >>> >>> >> >         while (list2.hasMore()) {
>> >>> >>> >> >             NameClassPair next = list2.next();
>> >>> >>> >> >             System.out.println(next.getName());
>> >>> >>> >> >         }
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> > Why i cant find my ejbmodule from EJB that is residing in my
>> >>> >>> webapp???
>> >>> >>> >> Do i
>> >>> >>> >> > have to do something different in EJB?
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > --
>> >>> >>> >
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >>> > *SCJA. José Luis Cetina*
>> >>> >>> >
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >> *SCJA. José Luis Cetina*
>> >>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> > *SCJA. José Luis Cetina*
>> >>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > *SCJA. José Luis Cetina*
>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> *SCJA. José Luis Cetina*
> -------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to