IIRC wicket application can be seens as a kind of page factory so with deltaspike that s easy to integrate both (a bit like pax did for blueprint) Le 25 déc. 2012 01:28, "Ron Smits" <ron.sm...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> That will be the next part currently I am using > http://jeff-schwartz.blogspot.nl/2011/03/java-ee6-wicket.html just to see > how much change I have to make to make it work. > Also wicket-cdi is weld based...... > > I Haven't Lost My Mind - It's Backed Up On Disk Somewhere > > > On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > +1 > > > > That said i'd use wicket cdi instead of an ejb integration > > > > Wdyt? > > Le 24 déc. 2012 22:22, "John D. Ament" <john.d.am...@gmail.com> a écrit > : > > > > > EJB 3.1 introduced standardized naming conventions. The best one to > use > > is > > > the one that matches: > > > > > > > > > java:global[/<application-name>]/<module-name>/<bean-name>#<interface-name> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Ron Smits <ron.sm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Evening > > > > > > > > Been playing with tomee and wicket. I had quite a hard time getting > > > wicket > > > > to play nice with EJB's because it could not use the right naming > > > strategy. > > > > Apparently tomee publishes EJB's with two names: > > > > -- > > > > HelloEJB!ejb.HelloEJB > > > > org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.BusinessLocalBeanReference > > > > HelloEJB > org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.BusinessLocalBeanReference > > > > > > > > they are available from "java:global/tomee" context where tomee is > the > > > name > > > > of the project I am working on. there is an easy solution for with > the > > > > wicket javaee-inject module. but what would be the best jndi name to > > use? > > > > My 'guess' would be the first one as it is likely to be more unique. > > > > > > > > comments? > > > > > > > > Ron > > > > I Haven't Lost My Mind - It's Backed Up On Disk Somewhere > > > > > > > > > >
