not sure it is related, think it is log just for info because it tends to be an issue (that's not a common usage) - that's how i understand it looking the code
Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2013/1/7 Bertrand Guay-Paquet <ber...@step.polymtl.ca>: > As far as I can see it works, yes. > > However, I do have a suspicious eye towards warnings which I don't > understand. Also, I thought maybe this was somehow related to the crash I > get if I uncomment the "seam-conversation-owb" dependency in the pom. > > Bertrand > > > On 07/01/2013 4:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> >> BTW guys, >> >> it works then no? just warnings at startup no? >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> 2013/1/7 Bertrand Guay-Paquet <ber...@step.polymtl.ca>: >>> >>> Harald, >>> >>> Thanks for jumping in! I think you are much better informed regarding >>> this >>> issue than I am. >>> >>> Regarding the UnmanagedObject class, you are right. I meant "unmanaged" >>> in >>> the sense that wicket does not inject it automatically, but via a method >>> call in the constructor. Since this test project could be referenced >>> elsewhere, I'll add a comment to that effect. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Bertrand >>> >>> >>> On 07/01/2013 4:03 PM, Harald Wellmann wrote: >>>> >>>> wicket-cdi does not define beans, they define injection targets which >>>> OpenWebBeans (IMHO incorrectly) treats as managed beans, hence the >>>> confusing >>>> messages. >>>> >>>> I've started a new thread [1] on the OWB user list for this issue. >>>> >>>> I've tested Bertrand's sample without problems on GlassFish/Weld, and >>>> the >>>> Weld implementation code for InjectionTargets looks a good deal cleaner >>>> to >>>> me. >>>> >>>> Bertrand: By the way, the UnmanagedObject in your sample is in fact a >>>> managed bean - not adding a @XXXScoped qualifier does not make it >>>> unmanaged, >>>> it's a managed bean with @Dependant scope. >>>> >>>> [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openwebbeans.user/369 >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Harald >>>> >>>> Am 07.01.2013 07:44, schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: >>>>> >>>>> wicket-cdi defines beans with constructor params without @Inject on >>>>> the constructor so it is not a cdi bean for cdi >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> then not sure how they use it but the issue is in wicket-cdi >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> if it is a false cdi bean (manage by wicket) it should be annotated >>>>> Typed(), if not the constructor should be annotated @Inject >>>>> >>>>> >
