Looks like I missed this thread :-) I'll pull the copy I made from my public space. I don't really have a preference regarding md5sums, I just thought they were left out accidentally.
-Mike On 9/6/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There has been a lot of discussion in the incubator on the topic of > whether md5 is required or even recommended. Last I recall, since the > release is signed, md5 is extra and optional. > > I wouldn't recommend that we add md5 to our process here. Others can > express their opinions... > > Craig > > On Sep 5, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Bill Slack wrote: > > > Thanks Patrick > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Linskey" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:58 PM > > Subject: Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release? > > > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I think that we've only got PGP this time around. IIRC, we did this > >> because we only need PGP keys for Apache release requirements, and > >> probably generating MD5 checksums also was either too slow or hard to > >> do from mvn. > >> > >> -Patrick > >> > >> On 9/5/07, Bill Slack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> It doesn't look like my original message was received by the > >>> list, so I'll try again. > >>> > >>> Before I download the current version, I would like to get the > >>> MD5 checksum, but all I can find are the PGP signatures and > >>> checksums for older releases. > >>> Is there no checksum for the latest release? > >>> Thanks, > >>> Bill > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Patrick Linskey > >> 202 669 5907 > > > > Craig Russell > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > >
