same problem on postgres 7.4. broken in 1.0.1 but works in 1.0.0 will there be a 1.0.2 release to fix these sorts of things?
cheers, rog Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > Frank- > > This sounds like something that was fixed in the trunk for revision > #584463: > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=584463> > > It was a fix for a problem introduced by > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-378 > >. > > The latest trunk snapshots don't have the bug, but the fix would need > to be backported to 1.0 branch if a fix is needed for that line. > > Can you open a JIRA so we can track it? > > > > On Nov 12, 2007, at 5:11 PM, frankca wrote: > >> >> I run a regression tests from 1.0.0 i.e. the tests work with 1.0.0. >> >> Look at the generated SQLs, it obviously missing the subquery using >> ROWNUM >> (using Oracle DB). >> >> Here are the SQL stmts: >> OpenJPA 1.0.1: >> >> SELECT t0.id AS c0, t0.version AS c1, t0.last_updated_by AS c2, >> t0.last_updated_date AS c3, t1.id AS c4, t1.version AS c5, >> t1.last_updated_by AS c6, t1.last_updated_date AS c7, t2.id AS c8, >> t2.version AS c9, t2.last_updated_by AS c10, t2.last_updated_date AS >> c11, >> t2.language AS c12, t2.name AS c13, t1.content AS c14, t3.id AS c15, >> t3.version AS c16, t3.last_updated_by AS c17, t3.last_updated_date >> AS c18, >> t3.name AS c19, t1.load_date AS c20, t4.id AS c21, t4.type AS c22, >> t1.modified AS c23, t1.review_status AS c24, t1.title AS c25, t1.url >> AS c26, >> t5.id AS c27, t5.version AS c28, t5.last_updated_by AS c29, >> t5.last_updated_date AS c30, t5.name AS c31, t6.id AS c32, >> t6.version AS >> c33, t6.last_updated_by AS c34, t6.last_updated_date AS c35, t6.name >> AS c36, >> t7.id AS c37, t7.version AS c38, t7.last_updated_by AS c39, >> t7.last_updated_date AS c40, t7.name AS c41, t0.byte_length AS c42, >> t0.byte_offset AS c43, t0.text AS c44 FROM fact t0, document t1, >> collection >> t2, data_source t3, mime_type t4, fact_rule t5, fact_type t6, >> fact_type t7 >> WHERE (t0.fact_type_fk = ? AND t0.document_fk = ?) AND >> t0.document_fk = >> t1.id(+) AND t0.fact_rule_fk = t5.id(+) AND t0.fact_type_fk = >> t7.id(+) AND >> t1.collection_fk = t2.id(+) AND t1.data_source_fk = t3.id(+) AND >> t1.mime_type_fk = t4.id(+) AND t5.fact_type_fk = t6.id(+) >> [params=(long) 3, >> (long) 2] >> >> OpenJPA 1.0.0: >> >> SELECT * FROM (SELECT r.*, ROWNUM RNUM FROM (SELECT t0.id AS c0, >> t0.version >> AS c1, t0.last_updated_by AS c2, t0.last_updated_date AS c3, t1.id >> AS c4, >> t1.version AS c5, t1.last_updated_by AS c6, t1.last_updated_date AS >> c7, >> t2.id AS c8, t2.version AS c9, t2.last_updated_by AS c10, >> t2.last_updated_date AS c11, t2.language AS c12, t2.name AS c13, >> t1.content >> AS c14, t3.id AS c15, t3.version AS c16, t3.last_updated_by AS c17, >> t3.last_updated_date AS c18, t3.name AS c19, t1.load_date AS c20, >> t4.id AS >> c21, t4.type AS c22, t1.modified AS c23, t1.review_status AS c24, >> t1.title >> AS c25, t1.url AS c26, t5.id AS c27, t5.version AS c28, >> t5.last_updated_by >> AS c29, t5.last_updated_date AS c30, t5.name AS c31, t6.id AS c32, >> t6.version AS c33, t6.last_updated_by AS c34, t6.last_updated_date >> AS c35, >> t6.name AS c36, t7.id AS c37, t7.version AS c38, t7.last_updated_by >> AS c39, >> t7.last_updated_date AS c40, t7.name AS c41, t0.byte_length AS c42, >> t0.byte_offset AS c43, t0.text AS c44 FROM fact t0, document t1, >> collection >> t2, data_source t3, mime_type t4, fact_rule t5, fact_type t6, >> fact_type t7 >> WHERE (t0.fact_type_fk = ? AND t0.document_fk = ?) AND >> t0.document_fk = >> t1.id(+) AND t0.fact_rule_fk = t5.id(+) AND t0.fact_type_fk = >> t7.id(+) AND >> t1.collection_fk = t2.id(+) AND t1.data_source_fk = t3.id(+) AND >> t1.mime_type_fk = t4.id(+) AND t5.fact_type_fk = t6.id(+)) r WHERE >> ROWNUM <= >> ?) WHERE RNUM > ? [params=(long) 3, (long) 2, (long) 5, (long) 2] >> >> -Frank >> >> >> >> Patrick Linskey-2 wrote: >>> >>> What SQL do you see? Is this a regression from 1.0.0, or something >>> that you're running into for the first time? >>> >>> -Patrick >>> >>> On Nov 12, 2007 4:46 PM, frankca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Programmatically pagination does NOT work with OpenJPA 1.0.1 i.e. >>>> using >>>> EntityManager.setFirstResult()/setMaxResults(). >>>> >>>> Sorry, I don't have time to package a test case for now. >>>> >>>> -Frank >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://www.nabble.com/Programmatically-pagination-does-NOT-work-with-OpenJPA-1.0.1-tf4795034.html#a13717713 >>>> Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Patrick Linskey >>> 202 669 5907 >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Programmatically-pagination-does-NOT-work-with-OpenJPA-1.0.1-tf4795034.html#a13717920 >> Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Programmatically-pagination-does-NOT-work-with-OpenJPA-1.0.1-tf4795034.html#a14186916 Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
