Hi Tedman,

I noticed the reply but didn't get a chance to look at it in any depth. For
reasons I'm not quite sure of only some of the maven artifacts were
published during the last release. I'm working on adding the missing
artifacts back in.

When we get everything added to the maven repository then you should be able
to use the "openjpa" artifactId. As I understand it you can do so now with
previous releases.

Thanks for your patience,
-Mike

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Tedman Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I should add, that I posted an email just recently noting that the openjpa
> maven repositories in repo1.maven.org appear to be broken as there's
> dependent items which are missing. I never heard back so I don't think
> anyones actually fixing it or anything.
>
> I just tried openjpa from maven again right now and it's still broken.
>
>   Project ID: null:openjpa:jar:null
>
>   Reason: Cannot find parent: org.apache.openjpa:openjpa-parent for
> project:
>   null:openjpa:jar:null for project null:openjpa:jar:null
>
>
> > Hi
> >
> > You should use "openjpa" as the maven artifactID (even though it's
> actually
> > created in the openjpa-all directory).
> >
> > For example :
> > <dependency>
> >     <groupId>org.apache.openpa</groupId>
> >     <artifactId>openjpa</artifactId>
> >     <version>1.x.y</version>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> > -Mike
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:10 AM, Stojce Dimski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to use openjpa via maven for pure JPA part (no xml storage
> > > etc...) in my Java6 environment... Which module should I include ?
> > >
> > > openjpa ?
> > > openjpa-all ?
> > > openjpa-persistence ?
> > > openjpa-persistence-jdbc ?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >      ___________________________________
> > > Scopri il Blog di Yahoo! Mail: trucchi, novit?, consigli... e la tua
> > > opinione!
> > > http://www.ymailblogit.com/blog/
> > >
>
> --
>                                                           Ted Leung
>                                                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Being normal is vastly over rated.
>
>

Reply via email to