Hi Would it be better to have the field as a byte[], then write the object to this array and the store it, instead of straight from Object to db
Håkon 2008/11/12 Håkon Sagehaug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > hi > > So now I got a class that has a field that is of type java.lang.Object, I > seems to go fine storing it, but when I want to retrieve the object from the > db I get null. > > I use postgresql and tried with two tables one with datatype oid and one > with bytea, but both returns null. > > Is this the right approach or is this wrong. > > any tips > > cheers, Håkon > > 2008/11/12 Håkon Sagehaug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi >> >> So what I got out of this is, if I've got a object asd type for a field I >> can persist it but not query it for content, right?? That's fine for me. >> >> cheers, Håkon >> >> >> 2008/11/11 Pinaki Poddar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >>> Hi, >>> Please refer [1] for different levels of support OpenJPA provides for >>> relation fields whose types are not explicitly declared at design time. >>> >>> [1] http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/latest/docs/manual/manual.html#type >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://n2.nabble.com/Using-object-as-a-type-for-a-filed-in-a-enity-tp1485319p1485602.html >>> Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Håkon Sagehaug, Software Developer >> Parallab, Bergen Center for Computational Science (BCCS) >> UNIFOB AS (University of Bergen Research Company) >> > > > > -- > Håkon Sagehaug, Software Developer > Parallab, Bergen Center for Computational Science (BCCS) > UNIFOB AS (University of Bergen Research Company) > -- Håkon Sagehaug, Software Developer Parallab, Bergen Center for Computational Science (BCCS) UNIFOB AS (University of Bergen Research Company)
