Hi Fay, Yes, good catch. I was thinking of that one when I was putting the list together. At this point, I would put SolidDB in the "Not Currently Covered" category. Thanks.
Kevin On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Fay Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Kevin, > > What about SolidDB? The memory-based relational database? > > --- On Fri, 5/15/09, Kevin Sutter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Kevin Sutter <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: Database support > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Friday, May 15, 2009, 2:09 PM > > Okay, so I'm looking at our stated > > database support [1]. From this chart, I > > would divide up the databases into the following > > categories. The "Not > > Currently Covered" category is where I would focus my > > phishing efforts > > first. Any discussion? > > > > Covered Interest by members of OpenJPA Community > > ======================================= > > o Derby > > o DB2 > > o Informix > > o Oracle > > o MS SQL Server ??? > > o Sybase ??? > > > > > > Not Currently Covered Interest by members of OpenJPA > > Community > > ================================================= > > o MySQL > > o PostgreSQL > > o H2 > > o HSQLDB (Hypersonic) > > o Firebird ??? > > > > > > Are these still required? > > ================= > > o Borland Interbase > > o Borland JDataStore > > o Empress > > o Intersystems Cache > > o MS Access > > o MS Visual FoxPro > > o Pointbase > > > > Thanks, > > Kevin > > > > [1] > > > http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/latest/docs/manual/manual.html#dbsupport > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:01 AM, David Beer < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hi Kevin > > > > > > Some database vendors usually have some sort of > > universal contact which > > > might be the best way of going about it. Posting a one > > of message to > > > support forums might well be an idea that could work. > > > > > > David > > > > > > On Thu, 14 May 2009 08:46:03 -0500 Kevin Sutter > > > <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:10 PM, David Beer > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Kevin > > > > > > > > > > I currently use OpenJPA with the H2 database > > for my embeded > > > > > programs, and will be considering MySQL for > > larger scale programs. > > > > > I think that the more database vendors or > > suppliers we can get > > > > > links with the better for both sides. I am > > happily using H2 with > > > > > OpenJPA but there were some features I had > > to ask about and how to > > > > > work with OenJPA. > > > > > > > > > > So my point is that we need a way of getting > > committers or users > > > > > from both sides to help so we need a way of > > maybe certifying a > > > > > database version. > > > > > > > > > > > > It sounds like we're on the same page. The > > tricky part is signing up > > > > this help and support from these database vendors > > and users groups. > > > > Maybe I should just post to these vendor's user > > forums and ask for > > > > some support. Just go phishing... :-) > > > > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jut my thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 13 May 2009 16:36:53 -0500 Kevin > > Sutter > > > > > <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm trolling... I'm looking for > > ideas on how we can better > > > > > > integrate with the various database > > vendors. Many of us > > > > > > committers have our own "favorite" > > databases due to our > > > > > > employers' needs. But, what about > > the MySQL, or Postgres, or SQL > > > > > > Server, or pick your favorite > > databases? I know we have had some > > > > > > interest from these database vendors on > > our users and dev forums, > > > > > > but I'm looking for ways to get these > > vendors more involved. > > > > > > When they produce a new version of > > their database, it would be > > > > > > great to announce OpenJPA > > support. And, if they have new > > > > > > features to take advantage of, that > > would be even better. > > > > > > > > > > > > Everybody's development and tests teams > > are limited. I understand > > > > > > that. But, I'm looking for ideas on how > > we can work together to > > > > > > accomplish this task. I'm going > > to cross post on both users and > > > > > > dev forums to see if there any lurkers > > that might have some ideas. > > > > > > > > > > > > Just to provide a real world > > example... I was just pinged about > > > > > > MS SQL Server 2008 support. Our > > OpenJPA manual only documents SQL > > > > > > Server 2005 support. I don't have > > experience with SQL Server. > > > > > > So, it made me think how we could > > improve this aspect of our > > > > > > OpenJPA database support. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
