On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Pinaki Poddar <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Hi Daryl,
>     something like:
>  /**
>   * Pour the persistent state of the given other instance into this
> (detached) instance.
>   * Some sort of reverse Object.clone().
>   * The implementation has to decide whether to deep copy or not.
>  **/


Ok, I get it. So there's no way to "reattach" an instance directly then?

PS: "copy constructor" is a constructor that takes an instance of the same
> type as input argument. Was popular in C++ days.
>
> I'm afraid I missed that. I guess I'm too young. That's what I'll keep
telling myself.

-- 
Daryl Stultz
_____________________________________
6 Degrees Software and Consulting, Inc.
http://www.6degrees.com
mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to