> Wouldn't you have to map it? I was thinking of trying to do it with the least > overhead. The class in the select new xxx() doesn't need to be mapped nor annotated. It just create a constructor with the same signature as the parameters passed in.
> Ideally I wanted the results in a Map, with the first column as the key, but > I > figured I'd probably not see that until JPA 3.1 :) I'm eagerly waiting some JPA 3.1 features, such as element collections and criteria ;)
