On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Pinaki Poddar [via OpenJPA] < [email protected]<ml-node%[email protected]> > wrote:
> > It is used both to determine whether a class should be an @Embedded, and > it is also used to determine > whether a class should be a @MappedSuperclass > (!). > > You are exactly right. And that is one of the reasons why in OpenJPA 2.0 > there is a distinction via ClassMetaData.isAbstract() -- which in > persistence world implies @MappedSuperclass. > OK; thanks. Can't move to 2.0 just yet. In the meantime I've got it working. > I am not familiar with the connotation of the term 'cricket' (being born > in a place where major activity is to be glued on a TV set to watch a game > similar to baseball and loved by englishmen during past century, the word > 'cricket' means some protracted, useless activity to me:), but from your > usage I see you were not pleased with the responses on your earlier quest on > the similar topic. > "Hearing crickets" is what happens when you're in a big, empty, otherwise silent place, far from any sign of group activity. :-) :-) :-) But now there is activity.... > But with reverse mapping tool and pre-OpenJPA 2.0 and MappedSuperclass you > may be in that difficult place where there is only 'cricket' -- in my sense > of the term ;) > :-) Thanks for the help. Best, Laird -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/MappedSuperclasses-tp4126924p4145197.html Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
