On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Pinaki Poddar [via OpenJPA] < ml-node+6743785-1152618025-155...@n2.nabble.com> wrote:
> > Did the OpenJPA folks do this because they thought it was a nice thing to > > > do, or because they were under the impression the specification implied > it? > > OpenJPA is a misnomer, in a sense. Most of OpenJPA existed six/seven years > *before* JPA 1.0 specification came into being. So my guess would be that > the feature predates the specification. > OK; thanks. Just trying to figure out whether I will make things worse for each of the Big 3 providers if I manually insert rows into this table, or whether it's supposed to be fully under JPA control. It looks like no one is quite sure. :-) EclipseLink is reasonably adamant that unless their eclipselink.ddl-generation properties are set absolutely NO automatic insertions into ANY @TableGenerator-referenced tables will take place. Hibernate is...well, it's Hibernate. :-) I'm trying to figure out what it's doing at the moment. As usual. :-) Best, Laird -- http://about.me/lairdnelson -- View this message in context: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/TableGenerator-interesting-unspecified-behavior-tp6743685p6743807.html Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
