There is a JDO-3.0 spec out there since almost a year now. I'm not sure if we can/like to catch up.
Isn't there a pure JDO impl at db.apache.org which is up2date anyway? LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael Dick <michael.d.d...@gmail.com> > To: users@openjpa.apache.org; d...@openjpa.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:21 AM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] JDO usage end-of-life? > >T here is at least some interest from a subset of our users. Matthew Adams > and issue: OPENJPA-1744 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1744>to add support for > JDO last July. I closed the issue, but Matthew responded > and the issue was reopened. > > There hasn't been a lot of activity on the JIRA since then. There are some > users watching it, but no one has voted for it. If there's an outpouring of > support from the users list, and a committer (or aspiriing committer) is > interested in championing the effort, I'd be all for adding a JDO persona. > Absent a champion who is ready to dive into the code, I think that we should > clean up the references to jdo. > > Even if OpenJPA removes the references to JDO, I'm sure a separate module > could be written that sits on top of our binaries. I suspect that's what BEA > / Oracle did. > > -mike > > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Kevin Sutter <kwsut...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> Sorry to cross post to both forums, but I wanted to ensure that I hit >> everybody that might have an opinion on this JDO topic... >> >> Is the JDO personality of OpenJPA still being utilized? Marc's recent > post >> about possibly pulling in javax.jdo.* packages during the enhancement >> processing [1] reminded me that we still have old remnants of JDO (and >> Kodo) >> in the OpenJPA code base. OpenJPA has never claimed support for JDO (nor >> Kodo). Way back when, BEA provided a JDO implementation as part of their >> offering that sat on top of OpenJPA. As far as I know, BEA (and Oracle) >> only support the 1.1.x service stream of OpenJPA. So, if we did this in >> the >> 2.x stream, there should be no effects to that set of users. >> >> Would there be a concern with the current users of OpenJPA to clean up the >> code base and remove these JDO/Kodo references? From a JPA/OpenJPA >> perspective, you should see no differences in functionality. >> >> Like I said, Marc's posting prompted me to revisit this topic. I'm > just >> exploring the option with no immediate plans of actually doing the work... >> >> Thanks, >> Kevin >> >> [1] >> >> > http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/weird-JDO-Exception-when-using-OpenJPA-2-Enhancer-tc6870122.html >> >
