Excellent. Thanks for the reply. On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:15 AM, areider <open...@reider.net> wrote:
> Kevin, > > >> Well, you didn't mention that you had a test case that proved > >> otherwise... > :-) > > My fault sorry, working as advertised. (that is, if there is no active > transaction and the context is extended, then no error is thrown) > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/TransactionRequiredException-on-persist-on-extended-EM-tp6972526p6974888.html > Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
