I was speaking about javax.* apis in general. JPA2.x are EPL, but JPA1 is CDDL, isn't?
In any case I prefer having our own IP clean spec jars. It's just so much easier to not having to check the licenses each time. LieGrue, strub >________________________________ > From: Rick Curtis <curti...@gmail.com> >To: users <users@openjpa.apache.org>; Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >Sent: Friday, 15 November 2013, 18:15 >Subject: Re: Vote for standard JPA jar in maven > > > >> CDDL is still not perfect and some apis are even LGPL (which is a complete >>no-go). > > >CDDL? I thought that the javax.persistence files are EPL? > > > >On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > >The problem is usually not vendor neutrality but the license. >>CDDL is still not perfect and some apis are even LGPL (which is a complete >>no-go). >> >>Thus using our very own clean room engineered org.apache.geronimo.spec.* API >>jars is still the safest bet. >> >>LieGrue, >>strub >> >> >> >> >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Matthew Adams <matt...@matthewadams.me> >>> To: users@openjpa.apache.org; kundera-disc...@googlegroups.com >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Thursday, 14 November 2013, 17:47 >>> Subject: Vote for standard JPA jar in maven >>> >>> Please vote for this issue, requesting that a standard, vendor-neutral JPA >>> jar be published. >>> >>> https://java.net/jira/browse/JPA_SPEC-60 >>> >>> -matthew >>> >> > > > >-- >Rick Curtis > > >
