> OK, so can I suggest that the web page needs updating as it is currently > misleading.
Oh, thanks for the pointer! > Also why do you suppose that Eclipse seems to think that the openjpa > jar file in tomee contains a 2.1 JPA implementation rather than a 2.0 one? > It is resisting me trying to "downgrade" JPA support to 2.0 with the > 2.4 jar installed. Hmm, that’s weird indeed. But I guess this has more to do with Eclipse than with openjpa. LieGrue, strub > Am 06.04.2015 um 13:15 schrieb David Goodenough > <david.goodeno...@btconnect.com>: > > OK, so can I suggest that the web page needs updating as it is currently > misleading. > > Also why do you suppose that Eclipse seems to think that the openjpa > jar file in tomee contains a 2.1 JPA implementation rather than a 2.0 one? > It is resisting me trying to "downgrade" JPA support to 2.0 with the > 2.4 jar installed. > > David > > On Monday 06 April 2015 12:17:00 Mark Struberg wrote: >> Hi! >> >> openjpa-2.4.0 is indeed targetting JPA-2.0. >> >> I personally would like to target JPA-2.1 soon, but before that I would >> love to see a few cleanup efforts being done. E.g. cleaning up our bytecode >> parts and move all to xbean-asm5-shaded. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >>> Am 06.04.2015 um 11:15 schrieb David Goodenough >>> <david.goodeno...@btconnect.com>: >>> >>> According to:- >>> >>> http://openjpa.apache.org/jpa-2.1-development-process.html >>> >>> openjpa 2.4 is the release that should implement JPA 2.1. But I am told >>> on the tomee mailing list that although tomee 2.0 included an >>> openjpa 2.4 snapshot it does not support jpa 2.1. >>> >>> I am confused, can someone enlighten me. >>> >>> David >
