Works fine now - Could not test pirbot & easyname due to firewall issues, all others aok!
Thanks again! > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de] > Sent: Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2015 14:26 > To: users@openjpa.apache.org > Subject: Re: Is OpenJPA 2.4.0 is released or not > > Should be resolved now. Can you please try it out? > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 13.10.2015 um 09:26 schrieb Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > > > > And thanks for all the reporting you do - that is equally important as well! > > > > Will try to fix the other links as well and ping back in the evening. > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > strub > > > >> Am 13.10.2015 um 07:32 schrieb Boblitz John > <john.bobl...@bertschi.com>: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> The download page now contains the links. > >> > >> I was able to download the binary. > >> > >> The Source downloads did not work. > >> > >> HTTP link responds with NOT FOUND - url mirror/..... not found on > >> server FTP link responds with Failed to open file > >> > >> I can not reach all of the HTTP sites due to a local firewall - but it > >> seems > that the source download page is bugged. > >> > >> > >> Thanks for the hard work you are doing! > >> > >> John > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de] > >>> Sent: Montag, 12. Oktober 2015 22:42 > >>> To: users@openjpa.apache.org > >>> Subject: Re: Is OpenJPA 2.4.0 is released or not > >>> > >>> fixed as well now. Can you please verify? > >>> > >>> txs and LieGrue, > >>> strub > >>> > >>>> Am 12.10.2015 um 14:23 schrieb Henno Vermeulen > >>> <he...@huizemolenaar.nl>: > >>>> > >>>> You're right, I don't see 2.4.0 listed on this page either: > >>>> http://openjpa.apache.org/downloads.html > >>>> > >>>> Henno > >>>> > >>>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > >>>> Van: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com] > >>>> Verzonden: maandag 12 oktober 2015 14:00 > >>>> Aan: users@openjpa.apache.org > >>>> Onderwerp: Re: Is OpenJPA 2.4.0 is released or not > >>>> > >>>> same for us, > >>>> > >>>> openjpa 2.4.0 available on maven central > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Boblitz John > >>>> <john.bobl...@bertschi.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> > >>>>> Maybe I'm just blind, but I do not see a link for 2.4.0 on the > >>>>> download page (http://openjpa.apache.org/downloads.html). > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> John > >>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de] > >>>>>> Sent: Mittwoch, 30. September 2015 20:41 > >>>>>> To: users@openjpa.apache.org > >>>>>> Subject: Re: Is OpenJPA 2.4.0 is released or not > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Henno, > >>>>>> big thanks for doing the tests and also for giving us the feedback! > >>>>>> We also use 2.4.0 in production already without any issues - > >>>>>> well, at > >>>>> least > >>>>>> without any regressions ;) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> LieGrue, > >>>>>> strub > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Am 21.09.2015 um 09:44 schrieb Henno Vermeulen > >>>>>> <he...@huizemolenaar.nl>: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The documentation does list 2.4.0 as a release so I think they > >>>>>>> just > >>>>> forgot to > >>>>>> update the downloads page! > >>>>>>> I'm no OpenJPA committer, perhaps they can give the "official" > >>>>>>> answer, > >>>>> but > >>>>>> here's our practical answer: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> We are using OpenJPA for a few years now. I can confirm from our > >>>>>> experience that the enhancer for OpenJPA 2.3.0 is not able to > >>>>>> enhance classes that are compiled with Java 8. It should be > >>>>>> possible to compile > >>>>> with > >>>>>> Java 7 and use a Java 8 runtime, but we haven't tried this. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> We have been using 2.4.0 with Java 7 in production (around 20 > >>>>>>> users) > >>>>> for > >>>>>> quite a few months. We have very thorough tests that use OpenJPA > >>>>>> and the actual database. All of them were passing on 2.3.0 and > >>>>>> Java 7 and are now passing on 2.4.0 with either Java 7 or 8, so > >>>>>> for us there are no new > >>>>> bugs in > >>>>>> 2.4.0 on top of Java 8. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> We actually started using Java 8 in production since this > >>>>>>> weekend, due > >>>>> to > >>>>>> extensive testing I'm confident everything works fine. I can't > >>>>>> yet say > >>>>> whether > >>>>>> lambdas inside entities are working correctly, but I don't see > >>>>>> why they shouldn't. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In short: I would say it's safe to use OpenJPA 2.4.0 and it > >>>>>>> won't be a > >>>>> barrier > >>>>>> to adopt Java 8. > >>>>>>> If you encounter other barriers for Java 8 adoption, consider > >>>>> compiling with > >>>>>> Java 7 but running with a recent Java 8 JRE. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Henno Vermeulen > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > >>>>>>> Van: Talden [mailto:tal...@gmail.com] > >>>>>>> Verzonden: vrijdag 18 september 2015 5:00 > >>>>>>> Aan: users@openjpa.apache.org > >>>>>>> Onderwerp: Is OpenJPA 2.4.0 is released or not > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> OpenJPA 2.4.0 appears to be available on MavenCentral (Dated > >>>>> 2015-04-20) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>> > http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails|org.apache.openjpa|openjpa|2.4. > >>>>>> 0|bundle > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In mailing list archives there's a call to vote (With votes up > >>>>>>> to > >>>>>>> 2015-04-24) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache- > >>> OpenJPA-2- > >>>>>> 4-0-tt7587965.html#none > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> But on the OpenJPA apache site the releases include only 2.3.0 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Is 2.4.0 officially released? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Is the April 20th 2015 artefact in Maven Central (that pre-dates > >>>>>>> the > >>>>> vote) a > >>>>>> safe and valid build for production purposes? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Am I correct that this version is required to enhance classes in > >>>>>>> a > >>>>> Java8 > >>>>>> runtime? A Java8 migration is highly desirable but wonder if > >>>>>> OpenJPA > >>>>> will be > >>>>>> a barrier. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If 2.4.0 was not officially released, is there a release coming? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Aaron Scott-Boddendijk > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> WBR > >>>> Maxim aka solomax > >> > >
