On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 01:33:10PM -0600, Tim Schaub wrote: > Stephen Woodbridge wrote: > > Isn't Tim or someone else working on GeoJSON to give an alternative to > > WFS that does not have the XML parsing and overhead? I would think that > > this might be a good alternative. If this is really happening, then we > > might want to ping the mapserver list about support GeoJSON in the 5.0 > > release. > > > > -Steve W > > I think we're close to an agreed upon specification for GeoJSON. > http://wiki.geojson.org/GeoJSON_1.0_RC_1 > > You can take a look at WKT/GML/GeoJSON side by side (sort of) in this demo > http://dev.openlayers.org/sandbox/tschaub/xml/examples/vector-formats.html > > FeatureServer will deal in GeoJSON. I'm guessing GeoServer will as > well. It would be cool to get MapServer in on it.
For the record, FeatureServer already has a GeoJSON Service, though it's not the default JSON service. ?format=GeoJSON // layername/all.geojson will both get you GeoJSON per-spec against current trunk. (or should.) Regards, -- Christopher Schmidt MetaCarta _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users
